Sunday, September 26, 2010

The former guerrilla set to be the world's most powerful woman - Americas, World - The Independent

The former guerrilla set to be the world's most powerful woman

Brazil looks likely to elect an extraordinary leader next weekend

By Hugh O'Shaughnessy

Sunday, 26 September 2010

Dilma Rousseff in her 1970 police mugshot, when she led a revolutionary group


reuters

Dilma Rousseff in her 1970 police mugshot, when she led a revolutionary group

  • Photos

    enlarge

Sponsored Links
'); google_ad_client = 'ca-pub-5964551156905038'; if (ref_url.indexOf("/arts-entertainment") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+4791354580'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/environment") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+1107748553'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/indybest") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+3474960607'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/life-style") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+2301525710'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/money") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+3913758598'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/news") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+1985344535'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/offers") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+4759364625'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/opinion") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+6546546544'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/sport") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+5668950562'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/student") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+4306162616'; } else if (ref_url.indexOf("/travel") != -1) { google_ad_channel = '6756172661+9352556589'; } else { google_ad_channel = '6756172661'; } google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '4'; google_ad_type = 'text'; google_image_size = '728x90'; google_feedback = 'on'; }else { document.write('
'); }
'); } else { document.write(''); } 5) $("div.box").removeAttr("style"); }); });

The world's most powerful woman will start coming into her own next weekend. Stocky and forceful at 63, this former leader of the resistance to a Western-backed military dictatorship (which tortured her) is preparing to take her place as President of Brazil.

As head of state, president Dilma Rousseff would outrank Angela Merkel, Germany's Chancellor, and Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State: her enormous country of 200 million people is revelling in its new oil wealth. Brazil's growth rate, rivalling China's, is one that Europe and Washington can only envy.

Her widely predicted victory in next Sunday's presidential poll will be greeted with delight by millions. It marks the final demolition of the "national security state", an arrangement that conservative governments in the US and Europe once regarded as their best artifice for limiting democracy and reform. It maintained a rotten status quo that kept a vast majority in poverty in Latin America while favouring their rich friends.

Ms Rousseff, the daughter of a Bulgarian immigrant to Brazil and his schoolteacher wife, has benefited from being, in effect, the prime minister of the immensely popular President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the former union leader. But, with a record of determination and success (which includes appearing to have conquered lymphatic cancer), this wife, mother and grandmother will be her own woman. The polls say she has built up an unassailable lead – of more than 50 per cent compared with less than 30 per cent – over her nearest rival, an uninspiring man of the centre called Jose Serra. Few doubt that she will be installed in the Alvorada presidential palace in Brasilia in January.

Like President Jose Mujica of Uruguay, Brazil's neighbour, Ms Rousseff is unashamed of a past as an urban guerrilla which included battling the generals and spending time in jail as a political prisoner. As a little girl growing up in the provincial city of Belo Horizonte, she says she dreamed successively of becoming a ballerina, a firefighter and a trapeze artist. The nuns at her school took her class to the city's poor area to show them the vast gaps between the middle-class minority and the vast majority of the poor. She remembers that when a young beggar with sad eyes came to her family's door she tore a currency note in half to share with him, not knowing that half a banknote had no value.

Her father, Pedro, died when she was 14, but by then he had introduced her to the novels of Zola and Dostoevski. After that, she and her siblings had to work hard with their mother to make ends meet. By 16 she was in POLOP (Workers' Politics), a group outside the traditional Brazilian Communist Party that sought to bring socialism to those who knew little about it.

The generals seized power in 1964 and decreed a reign of terror to defend what they called "national security". She joined secretive radical groups that saw nothing wrong with taking up arms against an illegitimate military regime. Besides cosseting the rich and crushing trade unions and the underclass, the generals censored the press, forbidding editors from leaving gaps in newspapers to show where news had been suppressed.

Ms Rousseff ended up in the clandestine VAR-Palmares (Palmares Armed Revolutionary Vanguard). In the 1960s and 1970s, members of such organisations seized foreign diplomats for ransom: a US ambassador was swapped for a dozen political prisoners; a German ambassador was exchanged for 40 militants; a Swiss envoy swapped for 70. They also shot foreign torture experts sent to train the generals' death squads. Though she says she never used weapons, she was eventually rounded up and tortured by the secret police in Brazil's equivalent to Abu Ghraib, the Tiradentes prison in Sao Paulo. She was given a 25-month sentence for "subversion" and freed after three years. Today she openly confesses to having "wanted to change the world".

In 1973 she moved to the prosperous southern state of Rio Grande do Sul, where her second husband, Carlos Araujo, a lawyer, was finishing a four-year term as a political prisoner (her first marriage with a young left-winger, Claudio Galeno, had not survived the strains of two people being on the run in different cities). She went back to university, started working for the state government in 1975, and had a daughter, Paula.

In 1986, she was named finance chief of Porto Alegre, the state capital, where her political talents began to blossom. Yet the 1990s were bitter-sweet years for her. In 1993 she was named secretary of energy for the state, and pulled off the coup of vastly increasing power production, ensuring the state was spared the power cuts that plagued the rest of the country.

She had 1,000km of new electric power lines, new dams and thermal power stations built while persuading citizens to switch off the lights whenever they could. Her political star started shining brightly. But in 1994, after 24 years together, she separated from Mr Araujo, though apparently on good terms. At the same time she was torn between academic life and politics, but her attempt to gain a doctorate in social sciences failed in 1998.

In 2000 she threw her lot in with Lula and his Partido dos Trabalhadores, or Workers' Party which set its sights successfully on combining economic growth with an attack on poverty. The two immediately hit it off and she became his first energy minister in 2003. Two years later he made her his chief of staff and has since backed her as his successor. She has been by his side as Brazil has found vast new offshore oil deposits, aiding a leader whom many in the European and US media were denouncing a decade ago as a extreme left-wing wrecker to pull 24 million Brazilians out of poverty. Lula stood by her in April last year as she was diagnosed with lymphatic cancer, a condition that was declared under control a year ago. Recent reports of financial irregularities among her staff do not seem to have damaged her popularity.

Ms Rousseff is likely to invite President Mujica of Uruguay to her inauguration in the New Year. President Evo Morales of Bolivia, President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and President Fernando Lugo of Paraguay – other successful South American leaders who have, like her, weathered merciless campaigns of denigration in the Western media – are also sure to be there. It will be a celebration of political decency – and feminism.

Female representation: A woman's place... is in the government

In recent years, female political representation has undergone significant growth, with dramatic changes occurring in unexpected corners of the globe. In some countries women are dominating cabinets and even parliamentary chambers. By comparison, the UK falls far behind, with only 22 per cent of seats in the Commons currently held by women.

Bolivia In the Bolivian cabinet, 10 men are now matched by 10 women. In 2009, women won 25 per cent of seats in the lower chamber, and 47 per cent in the upper chamber.

Costa Rica In 2010, women won 39 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Argentina In 2009, women won 39 per cent of seats in the lower chamber and 47 per cent in the upper chamber.

Cuba In 2009, women won 41 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Rwanda In 2009, women won 56 per cent of seats in the lower chamber and 35 per cent in the upper chamber.

Mozambique In 2009, women won 39 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Angola In 2009, women won 38 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Switzerland Has a female-dominated cabinet for the first time. In 2007, women won 29 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Germany In 2009, the cabinet had six women and 10 men. That year, women won 33 per cent of lower chamber seats.

Spain Nine women compared with eight men in cabinet. In 2008, women won 37 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Norway Equal numbers of men and women in the cabinet. Women won 40 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Denmark Nine women and 10 men in cabinet. In 2007, women won 23 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Netherlands Three women and nine men in cabinet. In 2010, women won 41 per cent of seats in the lower chamber.

Charlotte Sewell

Sponsored Links
'); }
334
  • "clbrown"'s response should be the final word on this article. Fine work.
  • clbrown
    Good lord, is this supposed to be JOURNALISM? Just look at this paragraph, for example: "Her widely predicted victory in next Sunday's presidential poll will be greeted with delight by millions. It marks the final demolition of the "national security state", an arrangement that conservative governments in the US and Europe once regarded as their best artifice for limiting democracy and reform. It maintained a rotten status quo that kept a vast majority in poverty in Latin America while favouring their rich friends." Widely predicted... ok, possibly true, but I haven't heard any predictions 'til now, and I can't find a lot of predictions of that. I get the impression that this might be "using journalism to lead towards a desired result." Which is immoral on every possible level. There's another term for that, of course... PROPAGANDA. But perhaps this sentence COULD be factual, so I'll let it slide. "It marks the final demolition of the 'National Security State'..." Really? Is that the OFFICIAL NAME of the prior form of government? Or, rather, is it the "slang term" used by the fascisti (used in the same fashion as "Capitalist Pigs" is used by the same people)? The use of pejorative language in a supposed "news article" is DISGUSTING. Again, it makes it clear that this isn't "news," it's pure and unadulterated PROPAGANDA. Next up on the hit-parade: "an arrangement that conservative governments in the US and Europe once regarded as their best artifice for limiting democracy and reform." REALLY? Oh, yes, because naturally, leftists (who favor greater governmental power, supposedly "to do good" but, in true "Animal Farm" fashion, consistently historically proven to be "to do good for those who hold that power" at the expense of the "little people") have NEVER engaged in any form of oppression, now, have they? Shall we talk about China and Tienanmen Square? Shall we talk about the slaughter of the Menscheviks by the Bolsheviks? Shall we talk about the NATIONAL SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY OF GERMANY (the real name of party of Hitler, though few people even know that today... and remember, the reason that the "Nazi" flag had a red background was to demonstrate their socialist foundation!) Oh, yes, extremist leftists have a GREAT track record. They've NEVER overseen horrific, crushing dictatorial regimes, have they? Oh, and "reform" isn't an inherently positive term. Sometimes "change" is good... if you go from a bad system to a better system. And sometimes "change" is BAD. Remember, again using the one reference so many people know best... Hitler and his little cabal "reformed" Germany, didn't they? Finally, "It maintained a rotten status quo that kept a vast majority in poverty in Latin America while favouring their rich friends." You have GOT to be kidding. The reason that Latin America is filled with poverty is because of a cultural bias towards "strongman" types. Which is INHERENTLY OPPOSED to the "conservative" (at least by the American definition) concept of "rugged individualism." "Conservative" favors "smaller, less powerful government." The growth of governmental strength does not give greater strength to the individual... all governmental power comes from taking that power away from individuals. A common Marxist/fascist idea is to try to play this as an "either/or" argument... ie, if you oppose big, oppressive government, you must necessarily side with "big oppressive business." THIS IS A LIE. I like to use an analogy... imagine being in a Japanese monster movie. If you live in downtown Tokyo, does it really matter whether it's Godzilla or Gamera who steps on your house? Is being stepped on by one somehow better than being stepped on by the other? All human history is broken down into a struggle... a struggle between two competing ideologies. Whether free men will be allowed to govern themselves, or whether they will be RULED by an elite few. It doesn't matter if the "elite few" are corporate CEOs or governmental bureaucrats or military strongmen. All of them see themselves as "the elites" and want to run our lives for us. This woman is a radical marxist. She's a stereotypical "Animal farm" character... she thinks that all of us should be equal, but we should all be ruled by the "smarter, more moral" people like her. God help her nation if she wins.
  • Another Chavez in the making. They all loved Viva Fidel, too, until he wouldn't stop the firing squads shooting 200 a week. These "puff pieces" always turn out to be just that.
  • And please note the standard lib "all is good" explanation for EVERYTHING... Her first marriage broke up under the strain of being a terrorist... (koff, smirk, chuckle) , her SECOND....well, who knows, (koff, smirk, chuckle again) BUT!!!!!, SHE never SHOT anybody, just terrorized. (spew) . (And William Ayres made bombs but never actually blew anyone up so he's OK) Viva Fidel has finally admitted the obvious, his "economic system" starved Cubans for decades- the libtards are MUTE about the whole affair) I also note a new 'tard tactic," "How DARE you get on these "liberal" message boards, you rightists" they say. . Interesting, A. they can't STAND the TRUTH, and B. they can't stand to admit that we in the center right PAY ATTENTION to BOTH SIDES. This runs counter to what they have been programmed to think -the hated "right" is ignorant and closed minded. Well, maybe so, but we are smart enough to know our enemy and keep a close watch.

  • hollywoodron
    Dude... you rock! Good job.
  • jless
    So many ignorant people who know nothing and opine any stupid thing that comes to mind. Lula was suppose to be a horrible dictator, communist lover, friend of Fidel, another Chavez.What happened? Brazil now is growing economically faster than any nation.The poverty level has fallen in record numbers,it was the first nation to emerge from the global recession...Dilma Rousseff is going to continue the same path to prosperity that Lula has started.Please be more informed,you may disagree but with facts and not stupid silly opinions.
  • zswaves
    "Libtard" that is so funny, so sad, so true.
  • WHATS NEW????? In the USA our leftist regime wants to revel in its failure to do everything but bankrupt the soul of its people. BRAZIL IS REVELING IN ITS WEALTH from WHAT????? OIL, OIL EXPLORATION, THAT OUR REGIME IS PAYING THEM 10 BILLION TO FIND and PROCESS ??? THE USA HAS MORE OIL
  • WarEagle01
    imadajam, you are in favor of abortion. You think it is perfectly OK to slaughter unborn children in their millions. Don't talk to me about compassion, libtard. We've seen through your faux claims of being compassionate and wanting social justice. That is why you are losing so badly. And you are losing really, really badly.
  • Is this news or editorial?
  • 4BlueStars
    Dan 't ya just love these commie rags with names like "Independent" and "Guardian"? Not even a pretense at objectivity. What a laugh! Reminds me of Robert Duvall's great line in "The Great Santini": "God! God! Why did you make so many stupid people?" Communism doesn't work, never has worked, never will work because it crushes the human spirit. Yet time and time again these demagogues come along, promise the moon and stars and heaven on earth, blame and demonize their opponents, then lead their people down the primrose path of shared and equal misery for everyone but themselves. What fools.
  • I strongly recommend you yank your investment money out of the Brazilian economy because this female Hugo Chavez will be stealing it if you don't. Thanks for the inside information here.
  • WarEagle01
    So if the Tiradentes prison was "Brazil's equivalent to Abu Ghraib," it couldn't have been that bad. Make a few flesh piles. Some yelling and degradation, but no real torture. Could have been worse.
  • His conclusion was about the USA. He's talking about the bearded Marxist's taking over the USA. The money gets sent out of the country....then very easily washed and recycled back into the USA to help buy influence here at home. You lefties have to have everything explained to you....and they you still do not understand. Eu falo portugues.....eu sei como vai.
  • sbenard
    Interesting article about an influential new leader. Sad, however, that it combines good information and biography with spin. Information wedded with indoctrination!
  • So if we have investments in Brazil we should close them out on Monday morning before the government takes them over in a socialist economic move to place all economic engines under their direct control and they pay the investor and builder nothing and then the state destroys them? Thanks for the warning.
  • She is set to become the worlds most powerful communist. All of a sudden it makes a great deal of sense as to why Maobama gave Brazilia Oil billions of dollars based on George Soros request. Right, comrade?
  • Phocus
    One thing that can be said about the writer of this article, Hugh O'Shaughnessy, he does not try to hide his bias. Writers like him are the reason fewer and fewer people trust the press or the old media. The guys is more of a stenographer than a journalist. Read the next line and see if it doesn't sound like propaganda..."It marks the final demolition of the "national security state", an arrangement that conservative governments in the US and Europe once regarded as their best artifice for limiting democracy and reform. It maintained a rotten status quo that kept a vast majority in poverty in Latin America while favoring their rich friends." Right out of the left's campaign literature. Only fools trust this writer...and this women.
  • PatDen
    "Most powerful woman"? What is Merkel of Germany, then? Chopped liver?
  • Nice Propaganda piece. Pitiful jounalistic piece.
  • imadajam
    Ok, since you telepathically seem to know what I do and do not support, you would know then that I support people's freedom to live as they choose, and make their own decisions about whether or not to have children which they may not be able to support or take care of. It's not up to you to make that choice for others, it's their life, their decision, they have to live with the consequences. No amount of quoting mythology or scriptures or self righteous posturing by an ignorant, hypocritical, immoral, racist, right wing rabble will change that.
  • Tangair
    Very well said. Succinct and accurate appraisal of what has been planned. Going forward, be prepared to read the same time-worn palaver reminiscent of a 60's college war protest. BTW, the Independent's bias is damning in the least.
  • ONTIME
    Hugh, When you suck that swamp water up your nose do you go to the swamp or does it come to you?
  • I spend 1/2 my time in Brazil. It appears there is really no legal protection there in the same way there is a bill of rights in the USA. The government appears to be able to do anything it likes with only a popular uprising to stop them. ( an the fact that they are backwards and can not enforce their laws due to lack of funding) . Its good there for now but I would not assume it will always be. Brazil still needs their Ronald Reagan.
  • hollywoodron
    So, let me get this straight... conservative US interests limit democracy & reform? Do you mean we limit communist brutal dictators who use propaganda & the poor to gain power over everyone? And does Russia or China or Iran or Castro or Chavez have better alternatives?
  • Brazil, revelling in its new oil wealth -- thanks to Obama and his moratorium (which was declared unconstitutional) but, he did it anyway ( putting 100's of thousands out of work) -- so that he and Soros and others in their communist regime could profit from the deep water oil drilling that is being conducted in Brazil -- and we, the American taxpayer paid over $2 billion dollars to Brazil -- for their deep water oil drilling, that the Obama administration said was too dangerous to do here ( their digging 3 times the depth we dug here). So, how's that "Fundamental Change" working out for you? Obamas bankrupting America and redistributing America's wealth around the world. Wake-up America, before its too late!!!
  • Dashark
    She's so wrong. She has never read the Works of Darwin and Maimonides. We Whites are the Children of Adam creators of White Civilization and High tech. Proof: 2010 San Francisco's Game Developer Conference was 100% White.
  • NOW we know why Federal tax dollars were sent to prop of oil companies in Brazil. Obama and his buddies are trying to establish another dictatorship in South America! It will fail. We need another Teddy Roosevelt as President who said "I will remove the dictators from Latin America and replace them with good men".
  • AfraidOfReprials
    It is so nice to read unbiased news like this. NOT.
  • regulas
    Looking at the background of this Marxist I am sure commie loving professors will be praising her in their upcoming lectures. Libtards around the land will envy over her and Hellywood will make a movie of great she is.
  • "You might want to look back at the past decade of U.S. zero income growth and runaway debt" Stupid lies and ignorance on your part. US income grew at a pace supporting the skyrocketing healthcare costs, but since that growth was off of W-2's, it does not show as income. Nevertheless it was paid for. The on budget deficit and debt was large but the deficit falling and the debt sustainable until the failed housing policies promulgated by Democrats created and popped the real estate bubble, and the response to the by the Obama administration was to quadruple the deficit. The off budget liabilities are the all but wholely the result of FDR and Democrat enforced fidelity to his failed social policies, and Johnson's amplification of them. If the US experiences hyperinflation, it will be because of the "as socialist as he can get" Obama. "If you were a little bit less partisan, you might consider the fact that Brazil's current President - a left-winger and former Steel Union Boss - is presiding over one of the world's greatest economic success stories of recent times." How much of that growth is the result of exportable oil? Lucky is better than wise, and if she was a violent Marxist revolutionary, I know she is not wise.
  • See how long it takes before the US and other Western leaders start branding her a terrorist.
  • Doriens101
    How wrong you are. How last century. Serra is not a multi millionaire at all. In fact his accounts have been illegally tapped into by the ruling party. Lula the union leader is a bona fide multimillionaire as is his son who was formally a warden at a zoo. Lula recently purchased real estate in Santos worth millions. Santos is where Petrobras will invest to harvest the offshore oil. Don't talk rubbish about US Corporations - state owned Petrobras, Banco do Brasil and others are larger. Corruption has reached levels that defy credibility. Dilma Rousseff has zero experience of governance in her own country much less the world's. Waste ? I could write pages to you. Leave your dated conspiracy theories out of my country. Stick to Venezuela.
  • Anyone who thinks this is a good thing is an idiot...plain and simple. This article is journalistic malpractice and if this radical communist gets elected, Brazil will go down in tyrannical flames...she was tortured...I guarantee she will return the favor to anyone who disagrees with her. Too many idiots to begin to count...
  • Ahhh. The euphoria of leftist idealism. Thank you AP for another blow hard piece of leftist fiction. Brazil will be circling the drain in short order. Mind you, these are hard core communists. The lady is a thug and a criminal too boot. The results are ALWAYS the same. Death and destruction. Communism is a corrupt ideology that is a disease upon civilization. Never worked. Never will. Corruption begets corruption: Morally, spiritually, economically, and politically.
  • Hy !! I'm Brasilian,daugter of Germans.My Heart is half and half :-)))) Sometimes Im really ashemed me with those things,but my Coutry is so beautiful and not all brasilians are bandits. Regards from Brasil Be happy !! And pray with me that Dilma don't winn this election. Sorry my englisch.
  • It may have escaped your attention but Lula is one of the popular politicians in Latin America (not just as Brasil) because he has improved the lives of millions of people and presided over a period of economic growth that now leaves Brasil with one of the largest economies in the world (7th last time i checked). In our current financial predicament we are hardly in a position to lecture anyone. As for your guff about crushing the human spirit, have you met any Brasilians?
  • imadajam
    Patronizing w*nker in your spare time, or perhaps it's hereditary? I don't need goons like you to "protect me", as invariably your notion of "protection" is extracting resources through violence, or threats of. Sod off back to your deluded imagined state of Bible sanctioned superiority and let us normal human beings live in peace.
  • You do not know what you are talking about.
  • In 2012 she'll lose her "most powerful woman" status to Palin.
  • Obama + Soros + Petrobas = Marxist takeover Our tax dollars at work. Time to storm Washington and... You can fill in the blanks.
  • QiaoYang
    This is an opinion piece, yes? OK, well in that case, no problem. As long as it's not purporting to be a straight news piece. The first paragraph is a howler. A real corker!
  • Just google, the answers are all there. Now how it ties in with a Marxist taking over Brazil, pure conjecture on my part, but it fits. Just look at the players, all good Marxists in their own right.
  • Rowwdy
    "The former guerrilla set to be the world's most powerful woman". Uhmmmm ok. Sorry, but I hardly think she qualifies as the "world's most powerful woman". Talk about sensationalizing a headline. I suppose this means Obamao will have to bow to her too. I mean after all, she is a fellow Marxist and going to be the leader of a another lost country. Check Brazil off as a place to visit now. Oh, don't forget Brazil is where the Nazi SS hid and the Brazilian govt. aided and abetted their hiding.
  • Notions of "equality and compassion" ....LOL ...you must spend most of your time peering in the mirror loving what you see! .... leftist policies clearly do not lead to justice or happiness. All one need do is look at a leftist. They are the most neurotic joyless fcuks on the planet.
  • ves333
    The only thing one can learn from this article is that The Independent, not just The Guardian is run by unhinged closet Marxists who would support a slightly milder version of Che Guevara. Their selective short, short memory prevents them from remembering what socialist/communist systems of government lead to. Great.
  • Like Our country, Brazil has many uninformed or just lazy people that will not do their our research as to what lays in store if they elect a person like this, nor do they care as long as she promises "Free Stuff" and "Payback". But, just like with Castro and Chavez they will find themselves right back where they started,,,with nothing but debt, troubles, food shortages, power outages and being Forced to come to the Gov't for help because like I said they are Lazy and uninformed. When you allow a great number of people to remain uninformed, lazy, and supported for free without working, like our media has done for decades, you will have a voter base, or the followers of a "Community Organizer" (meaning the people that have, for generation, lived off of the people that WORK for a living). In so doing you will end up with a person who is only interested in their own well being and power and to H*** with the populas. We have such a person in Washington and now you see what he is all about, Power over the people and wealth for his own deeds and needs. Brazil will suffer much and the great wealth from its oil will soon be seen in soldiers and Military arms. And, like the Gov't that once held her captive she too will torure and maime her opposition. It is a culture of corruption that is imbedded in that part of the world. They never earned what they have. It was always given to them by their leadership which dates back to their heritage of anchant Native tribes which "Allowed" them to live at the leadership's whim. Research may friends, Research, you will find that this is just another Dictatorship like the last 2000 yrs. They never learn.
  • akw
    Wow. Marxist propaganda. So much for journalism in the Independent - this should have been on the OPINION page.
  • ves333
    The only thing one can learn from this article is that The Independent, not just The Guardian are run by unhinged closet Marxists. That Latin America is being taken over by Marxism is old news. Let them have it as it nicely corresponds to the intellectual capacity of the people who choose that sort of political system voluntarily. It seems stout British "journalists" quickly forgot how the Marxist experiment had ended up here in Europe. Short memory or just selective, due to ideological derangement?
  • ThereelPatriot
    make sure you take all the Brazillians out of our country when you get in.
  • You want to look at corruption and dictatorship open your front door and look at the cameras looking back at you. None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  • DO_NOT_GIVE_FOREIGN_TROOPS_AMERICAN_ TROOP'S_HONORS.15.lyx. The Vietnam War was needless: Ho Chi Minh came to power because he was the Top American Intelligent Agent during WW II during the Japanese Occupation of Vietnam! Ho wanted to be the American Tito of South-East Asia; modeling himself on Marshall Tito of Yugoslavia as an American Ally against Joseph Stalin-ism of Russia And China! But the Dulles Brothers, who ran the CIA, and the Republican State Departments. decided that France was more important than Vietnam. So Britain was allowed to use American Lend-Lease Landing-Ships to bring French Colonial Troops back to Vietnam, so there could be a War with the Vietnamese Communists, so the French People would then turn against Communism. Without France, there could not have been a NATO in the judgment of the Dulles Brothers. All the U.S. Conscientious objectors to the Vietnamese War were sent to Maximum Security Prisons where the FBI arranged for them to be put in cells with Homosexual Rapists, and everyone of them was Homosexually Raped on the orders of Tough-man, U.S. Attorney General Bobby Kennedy! The Brazilian Troops were not Democratic, as American Troops are, and did not fight to uphold Civilizations Democratic Values as American Troops do! Sometimes they have been really mean and vicious. It is insulting to American Troops, to honor Foreign Dictatorship's Troops as one rightfully would American Troops.
  • matthew_curitiba
    1. Yes, millions of uneducated poor are going to be delighted when she gets in. No mention from the Indy, however, of the millions who are dreading this! 2. This article is somewhat biased, and as a translater, it sounds to me in places as if a document translated from Portuguese is being quoted. 3. Would you ever vote for a person who has never, in their life, worked to put food on the table? 4. What sort of socialist spends enough on handbags to feed entire families for a week? Yes, Dilma. 5. Mr Serra was also an activist against the military, although he never killed anyone, not being a Marxist terrorist. Dilma is accused of being a participant in the death of a conscript killed by a bomb thrown from a car. 6. Mr Serra has also been elected several times to public positions, rather than being a political appointee. This is the first time Dilma is being elected by the public. CONCLUSION: what an appalling example of propaganda masquerading as journalism. If I wanted to be spoonfed this rubbish I'd read the Guardian or New Statesman.
  • You have GOT to be kidding! You will soon see a Military buildup and a breakdown of living standards like any and ALL Maxists do to control the people and enrich themselves. This is no now then a rehash of the old dictatorships of the last 2000 yrs in that part of the world, no better but it WILL be a lot worse.
  • zswaves
    My one and only questio is this, what will happen when the world develops and uses a different souce of power than oil? Then what will happen to all of this so called "power" these governments can hold over on "US"?
  • charlie68
    How has Chavez 'destroyed Venezuela'? Venezuela is the strongest democracy in the Western hemisphere, with genuine participation by the electorate in building an equitable society. As opposed to pretend-democracies like the USA, where you get to vote for either wing of the business party (which flavor of turd do you prefer?) once every 4 years.
  • Oh boy!! Another Marxist commie! Hugo & Fidel are sooooooo happy!!
  • imadajam
    aha homeboy, and what kind of 'tard are you? The inbred variety i presume ...
  • pelago
    "Libtard" - the latest racial tagging of "regulas and the 13 friends". Meant of course are Brazilians, who might be having a lady-president very soon. She isn't yet, but already is the object of hate among some Yanks here, who can't understand that other independent countries have minds of their own and can think for themselves whom to vote for. Yes, Hollywood - but not only - will sooner or later, be wanting to make a movie about this courageous and competent woman. She'll be having a thorny road ahead of her, and frustated people like the ones here ( and they're not even Brazilians) - will want to indulge (as they already are doing), in their two-cents worth of "racial profiling".
  • imadajam
    It's amazing how many right wing trolls inhabit the independent comments section. This is a leftist news paper, what are you doing here? Notions of equality, compassion, and social justice don't suit you, they make you rage and raise your blood pressure, bugger off back to fox news.
  • Please!! Don't do it with me !!! I'm Peacefull!! Hugs from Brasil !!
  • It is Communism of sorts. Communism is another word for "authoritarianism". I spend half my time in Brazil and believe me the only reason they have a growth rate at all is that they are SO far behind. In fact all the governments that have these 10% rates of growth are so very behind. With the red tape and corrupt governments I assume China and India have I don't doubt they will all hit a growth wall relatively early on. I say this in spite of soon moving permanently to Brazil.
  • pelago
    Google knows all the answers. . . yes, we all google, but what a dimwit conclusion to make about someone who's not even as yet president of her country, which is Brazil. Why are you as a non-Brazilian worrying about whom other voters of sovereign states elect? Mind your own sorry business, and worry about the problems in your own country. Or don't you have any?

    Posted via email from Brian's posterous

No comments: